For many city dwellers, the move from a
major city to the suburbs occurs at some point throughout life be it to find
work, start a family, or to settle in a quieter location. For others, the move
from the suburbs to the city is a life-changing decision. With the rise of
industrialization and the growth of cities, many people uprooted and adapted to
city life in the hope to gain wealth in a booming industry. Unfortunately,
these workers faced terrible working and living conditions and had to struggle
to survive. Defined as the urban proletariat, or people who had only their
labor to sell, these people faced many hardships in their adjustment to urban
life. Georg Simmel describes this adjustment to modernity through Hans, a
farmer who had to transition from his rural existence to that of an urban one.
Though Simmel’s description of the life changes Hans experienced were from many
years ago, I find that most of Simmel’s eight characteristics of urban life
still hold astoundingly true to an individual’s current transition to a city.
While
reading about Hans I was struck but how identical his adjustment to city life
was to that of my friend who had recently moved to Chicago by herself. Hans
experienced isolation and alienation, developing a “blasé” attitude to the
surrounding environment. This desensitized attitude and apparent isolation was
evident in my friend as well. She was alone often because creating a sense of
community in the city is difficult. Like Hans, my friend has to work daily to
exchange her labor for a wage to make ends meet. As Simmel and Marx describe,
there is no personal connection to an employer who deals in a capitalist world
of pure monetary exchange. Furthermore, the idea that rational calculation is
at the heart of daily life is also evident. When searching for apartments my
friend had to weigh the pros and cons of the space she would move into. She had
to make sure she would be able to pay the rent with her monthly earnings while
having enough left over to feed and clothe herself. With this rational
calculation and life as a wage laborer, often compromises must be made. My
friend moved into an apartment directly above a loud nightclub, a space that is
not very conducive to sleep or relaxation at night, but an affordable option in
a relatively convenient location. However, this led to what Simmel describes as
an adjustment to a second nature. She is able to plan around the hectic nature
of her apartment while using her newly developed blasé desensitization to block
out the seemingly endless noise that would drive most people mad. Consequently, like Hans, my friend is free
from the restrictions of traditional society, which in this case would be life
in her parents’ house. Through this adjustment to urban living, she is able to
escape parental limitations and requirements of parental expectations. I found
it intriguing that although Simmel described Han’s adjustments to urban life
during the rise of modernity, many of the transitional characteristics hold
true today.

Also
interesting and relatable are Tonnies’ ideas of the shift from community where
individuals are interdependent on each other, to society, where individual
interactions are much more impersonal. Because in the city individuals are
exposed to a variety of people outside of their family, different sorts of
social bonds are created. When a person needs groceries, they do not expect to
get their food by milking their family’s cow and baking their own bread. City
life entails going to stores and interacting with strangers to acquire goods.
One might go entire days without seeing a familiar face which is just one way
that urban life changes an individual’s consciousness. Urbansim, the study of
urban life found within an urban community, emphasizes how much behavior and
thinking change when entering a city. While walking in the small, familiar
suburb where I grew up, I would expect to see people whom I know thus my
behavior would be open and friendly. However, walking in a city, especially in
unfamiliar or potentially dangerous areas, my behavior is very different. I
maintain a more defensive outlook and behavior and present a less approachable
appearance. What
I find most interesting is not only how the urban space shapes behavior, as in
the case of Hans and my friend, but how one’s behavior can shape the urban
space. For example, putting graffiti on walls is a behavior that often changes
the overall appearance of a neighborhood space. Conversely, behaviors like
social movements to clean up the space or add appealing parks are other ways to
influence one’s space. Evidently, many of the theories and concepts discussed
in The New Urban Sociology can not only help one understand the historical
implications of cities but they can be related to everyday urban life.
http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/society/10-major-differences-between-rural-and-urban-societies/23390/
No comments:
Post a Comment