Friday, January 30, 2015

The Explorer: Into The City


The Explorer: Into The City

By: Betsy Bonilla

           The world around us is rapidly changing, we noticed it by the new clothes we wear, the new cars we drive, how we now communicate with each other. We see it with our everyday changing lifestyles and even where it is that we actually live. What we have and how we have it is not always noticeable but it has ultimately pulled us away from rural areas into urban ones. We see it depicted in the media all the time; on the news, the Internet and every day on the TV. Even children's TV shows have to be changed to go along with our "evolving" way of life.
           Consider Dora the Explorer:
Before
 
            The little Hispanic girl that has a talking backpack, map, a furry purple monkey for a best friend and many other talking animals that she takes on adventures through the wilderness- over the mountains though the woods type of stuff- mean while "trying" to teach kids Spanish. Well, after about 10 years or so, someone decided that it was time for Dora to grow up and to move on to better and bigger things...the city! Here she replaces all of her fuzzy furry friends (never to be seen again including her best friend ‘boots’) with kids just like her (Kind of. Oh and Diego is now Pablo, I think.), adds some 'bing bing' (fancy charm bracelet and some diamond earrings), new cloths and throws away that magical paper map for an APP MAP on her fancy new cell phone. Unfortunately this is what the future generation is getting exposed to on a daily bases (and apparently loving Aunts in college). This unrealistic, materialistic view is what seems to be what makes the world go around.
After
            As they mentioned on the documentary: Requiem for Detroit, about the once great, successful, powerful, rapidly growing city, "ability to move on, meant the chance to move up". With the high demands of a faster and more reliable means of transportation that is exactly what Detroit once did, it move up and fast. With Ford moving from the farm, to the city pavement the car industry, in Detroit, added fuel to the growing desire for individuality and superiority. In an urban place where you now have to sell your labor for an hourly wage, at first having a car meant that you needed one and once everyone was able to afford one it became about who had the best one, the newest one. For sometime this was great for the rapidly growing city which brought in new people and new jobs. However, that was also it’s down fall and possibly all of ours. As soon as more competition and the need for smaller more efficient vehicles became present was when Detroit began to stand still. Most of the city left behind in ruins with only the poor left behind to climb out of the rubble. With the wonderful evil capitalism digging its claws deeper into humanity it continued and continues to separate the poor from the wealthy. It is just doing it on a different landscape.         

            Just think that in about 20 years or so 60 percent of the world's population will live in urban areas, some growing a lot faster than others. Granted that what someone might consider to be an "urban area" is completely different then what others might consider it to be. So we can't just look at the size or the population of the city or town, we also have to look at its location, its laws, its infrastructure or the lack there of, even how people interact with each other; the community. As I am writing this it has become harder and harder to distinguish what is the city and what is not. Some cities like Chicago have started to expand outward covering more land, blurring the boundaries of what is urban and what is not. Other places like Greenland consider places with 200 inhabitants to be urban and are growing a much smaller pace, but still growing.  

            So it is very important to look at all the different ways in which an urban community is made up of and to look at the past and present of what works or does not work. As Neil Blackshaw mentions in his article, “Whose city is it anyway? The harsh truth about urbanisation,” there are two ways to look at a city: as “...the key to economic growth and increased prosperity...” or “as being chaotic, and a focus of poverty and violence”. Unfortunately most, if not all, of the time it is only the wealthy that truly get to prosper from such type of environment and the poor are pushed to one side left to suffer. People who lack resources cannot leave the urban lifestyle to “better pastures” even if they wanted too and they cannot afford to live comfortably within the social spaces of the city. Sometimes growth is good, everyone seems to gain for a little while but when things grow too fast, and in a sense out of control, it becomes extremely, if not impossible, to sustain itself. This is why we have to study and learn about urbanization and urbanism, the actual structure and its culture, respectively according to Gottdiener. It is our future and let’s face it, the ‘one percent’ is not going to grow but the poor sure is.     


Work Cited
Gottdiener, M., Ryan, M. T., & Hutchison, R. (2015). The New Urban Sociology (Fifth Edition ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

No comments:

Post a Comment