Chicago is known for diversity. You can go from one neighborhood,
walk a mile and be in vastly different neighborhood. What makes up
the differences is largely structural forces. Structural forces are
instrumental to the cycle of poverty. Many individuals who are born
into poverty often remain in poverty. This cycle of poverty will
often lead neighborhoods to continually diminish. This diminishing
factor will often lead to the neighborhood inhabitants becoming
alienated from individuals living in "nice" communities.
They become alienated originally because of suburbanization. Those
who have the means move to "nice" neighborhoods, often in
the suburbs (Gottdiener, Hutchison, Ryan 140). Various
reasons, ranging from better schools to lower crime lead these
individuals to move.
This migration has a huge impact on the economy.
Individuals who move have historically been Caucasians. This is
referred to as white flight. It is quite rare for a neighborhood to
improve once this flight begins. This flight is likely perpetuated by
the broken windows concept. This concept states that if individuals
see that a neighborhood is run down they will want to move to a
neighborhood that is not run down. Unfortunately, only individuals
with the means can move and those without the means are forced to
stay in the neighborhood. The opposite of this flight is
gentrification, something that can be seen in the Chicago
neighborhoods of Pilsen and Logan Square. With this flight there are
many structural as well as culture factors that change. Businesses
that once thrived struggle. If an individual goes to an impoverished
neighborhood you won't find many Whole Foods or other higher end
chains. These chains just cannot stay open because their isn't enough
demand for their goods and services. Fast-Food thrives, largely due
to providing affordable food in a quick manner. So many businesses
simply cannot survive in neighborhoods that are experiencing flight;
there aren't enough customers. The businesses that do stay usually
sell items very cheap, resulting in workers being paid minimal wages.
There are usually not enough jobs available in these impoverished
neighborhoods. These structural factors lead to social isolation
(Wilson 18).
When
money leaves, poverty comes. Poverty leads to social isolation which
directly changes how things are done in impoverished neighborhoods.
An example of this isolation can be seen in, The Code of the
Streets, which states that conventional behavior and values have
been replaced by a code of respect that allots for violence (Anderson
1999). In a impoverished neighborhood in Chicago as depicted in a PBS
youtube clip, “Do you feel safe here?” This question was posed
from a resident of an impoverished neighborhood to an interviewer.
The interviewer was noticeably uncomfortable and dodged the question.
This example helps show the difference in attitudes that this social
isolation allows. Later on in the clip one resident sees a City of
Chicago police car and says, “That's the worst gang in Chicago”
(PBS youtube). These examples show how underprivileged neighborhoods
can develop stark differences from wealthier neighborhoods. The gang
comment exemplifies how many impoverished areas have a distrust of
police. Wilson develops how this attitude came to be.
Blacks
are more likely to live in impoverished neighborhoods than whites
(Wilson 59). This often leads to neighborhoods becoming segregated.
Blacks also average lower income levels than whites (Wilson 28). So
blacks often cannot afford to leave disadvantaged neighborhoods and
are subject to the declining structural forces. As a result of the
lack of opportunity in these impoverished neighborhoods blacks have
higher unemployment rates (Wilson 31). The lack of opportunity in
these disadvantaged neighborhoods lead blacks to have a higher rate
of violent crime as opposed to whites (Wilson 23).
These
disadvantaged neighborhoods often will have an effect on surrounding
neighborhoods and the end result is a community that is socially
isolated from the middle class.
Cycles
can be horrific. This cycle that perpetuates disadvantaged
neighborhoods is quite difficult to break. People want basic
necessities. These necessities include feeling safe in a
neighborhood. Desires influence where we choose to live. These
desires contain basic necessities but also can include being able to
live near a hospital or organic grocery store; something many
neighborhoods don't have the luxury of providing. So in a way seeing a higher end store such as Whole Foods indicates a neighborhood with relatively low crime.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o80wKKJI6uc
No comments:
Post a Comment